DENNIS CUNANAN FUNDAMENTALS EXPLAINED

“The testimony of Luy that Napoles knowledgeable him that Relampagos was their Speak to while in the DBM is considered hearsay, and therefore, inadmissible as evidence,” the court docket stated, referring to whistle-blower Benhur Luy.In its 35-web site selection, the Sandiganbayan’s First Division stated Relampagos and Cunanan’s steps had b

“These types of negligence was characterized through the want of even slight treatment, acting or omitting to act in a very situation where there is a obligation to act, not inadvertently but willfully and intentionally which has a aware indifference to implications in as far as other individuals might be afflicted,” the court docket mentioned.